Reconstruction analysis
Connections
Notes
STC p. 94 sets up PTB *ʔit on the basis of only two forms, Kanauri id and WB ac, identifying it (p. 162) as cognate to OC *ʔi̯ĕt.
To these we now add Chepang yat, motivating the allofamic reconstruction with -i- ⪤ -ya- variation, a pattern attested in several other roots (cf. #33 PTB *s-myak ⪤ *s-mik EYE, #2610 PTB *s-rik ⪤ *s-ryak PHEASANT / PARTRIDGE, etc.).
The Chinese form has been borrowed into Tai in compound numerals (e.g., Siamese sìp-ʔèt ‘eleven, rɔ́ɔj-ʔèt ‘one hundred and one’).
Several TB languages of Nepal have disyllabic forms for ONE where the first syllable has a superficial resemblance to this etymon, but these all seem to be borrowings from Nepali ek. See Matisoff 1995:126-7.
Chinese comparandum
一 OC *ʔi̯ĕt, GSR #394a-d ‘one’; Coblin 86:114 ST *ʔjit > OC *ʔjit; Schuessler 2007:563 *ʔit; B & S 2011: *ʔit {ʔi[t]}; Mand. yī.
Reflexes & cognates30 reflexes · 7 subgroups
0Sino-Tibetan (previously published reconstructions)1
0.1Tibeto-Burman (previously published reconstructions)3
2.1.1Western Himalayish12
2.4Kham-Magar-Chepang10
6.1.1Burmish2
9.0.1Old Chinese4
9.0.2Middle Chinese2
Cite this entry
*ʔit ⪤ *yat ‘ONE’.https://larc-iu.github.io/stedt/etymon/2277BibTeX
@misc{stedt-2277,
title = {{*ʔit ⪤ *yat 'ONE'}},
author = {STEDT},
year = {2017},
note = {Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus (STEDT) v1.0, etymon #2277},
url = {https://larc-iu.github.io/stedt/etymon/2277}
}