Reconstruction analysis
Notes
Tamangic points to a possible connection between this etymon and the concept FLAT. Cf. Thakali (Tukche) 'plja-lɔ ‘flatten dough (with roll)’.
The allofam with medial -y- is reconstructed because of vowel fronting in several forms (Pattani, Tshona, Lepcha, Thakali). There are two possible Chinese comparanda (see below).
Chinese comparanda
膚 OC *pli̯wo, GSR #69g ‘skin’; WSC-SH:134; WHB-OC #1367; Schuessler 2007:243. Li 1971 *pjag; Baxter 1992: *prja > Mand. fū.
皮 OC *bʼiɑ, GSR #25a-c ‘skin’; WHB-OC:1057; Li 1971: *bjiar; Baxter 1992: *b(r)jaj > Mand. pí.
The form written 膚 likely reflects the Chinese root, with the form written 皮 derived from it by a prefix that voiced the labial initial (as well as by an unexplained change to the coda). The most likely prefix is *m-, which is found in a number of OC words for human body parts and is cognate to the PTB prefix *m- having a similar function. In their latest system, Baxter and Sagart reconstruct this prefix in words for ‘nose’, ‘belly’, ‘head’, and ‘right hand’, as well as ‘skin’. The OC pronunciation of 皮 can be reconstructed as *m-pra-j, with root *pra. (See Sagart & Baxter 2010.)
Ignoring the medial *-j- (whose existence in OC is increasingly discounted, and which does not correspond regularly to anything in PTB), the correspondences between the variant PTB form *pra and the OC root are regular.
ZJH
Reflexes & cognates36 reflexes · 15 subgroups
1.1.2Deng8
2.1.1Western Himalayish1
2.1.2Bodic1
2.1.3Lepcha1
2.1.4Tamangish4
3.2Qiangic2
3.3rGyalrongic1
5Tujia7
6.1.1Burmish2
6.1.2.2Central Loloish1
6.1.2.3Southern Loloish1
9Sinitic1
9.0.1Old Chinese4
9.0.2Middle Chinese1
9.0.3Modern Chinese1
Cite this entry
*p(r/y)a ‘SKIN’.https://larc-iu.github.io/stedt/etymon/792BibTeX
@misc{stedt-792,
title = {{*p(r/y)a 'SKIN'}},
author = {STEDT},
year = {2017},
note = {Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus (STEDT) v1.0, etymon #792},
url = {https://larc-iu.github.io/stedt/etymon/792}
}