*sram
Reconstruction analysis
Intermediate reconstructions
Connections
Notes
Written Burmese phyam has always presented a puzzle (see STC 107, n. 302). In Matisoff 2010 (“Toward a Eurasian Bestiary”), I surmised that the labial initial arose through a reduction of a Mon-Khmer etymon (see Mon-Khmer *bheʔ, Shorto 2006:#260).
Lisu pu̱³³ and Hani (Khatu) pjá tɔ̃ seem clearly to be loans from Burmese.
After much hesitation, STC chose to treat the initial combination *sr- as an intrinsic cluster rather than as a sequence of prefix plus root initial. This analysis is buttressed by forms like Mizo sa-hram.
Chinese comparandum
猵 OC *piɑn, GSR #246i ‘otter’; Schuessler 2007:165 *pên; Mand. biān.
Comment: Cf. discussion in STC 107, n. 302, also Matisoff (2010). Forms with initial p- for ‘otter’ are apparently rare across TB languages except for Written/Spoken Burmese (WB phyam) and possibly Sak and Marma (both phaing).
Reflexes & cognates186 reflexes · 34 subgroups
0.1Tibeto-Burman (previously published reconstructions)7
1.1.1Tani1
1.1.1.1Western Tani12
1.1.1.2Eastern Tani4
1.1.2Deng5
1.2Kuki-Chin1
1.2.1.1Northern Chin2
1.2.1.2Southern Plains Chin3
1.2.2Central Chin7
1.2.3Maraic1
1.3.1Central Naga (Ao Group)10
1.3.2Angami-Pochuri Group1
1.3.3Zeme Group2
1.3.4Tangkhulic3
1.5Mikir [Karbi]3
1.7.1.1Bodo6
1.7.1.2Garo5
1.7.2Northern Naga/Konyakian1
1.7.2.2Konyak-Chang3
1.7.3.1Jingpho8
2.1.2Bodic7
2.1.2.1Tibetan21
2.1.3Lepcha2
3.2Qiangic16
3.3rGyalrongic2
3.3.1rGyalrong5
4Nungic8
6.1Lolo-Burmese4
6.1.1Burmish14
6.1.2Loloish3
6.1.2.1Northern Loloish13
6.1.2.2Central Loloish6
6.1.2.3Southern Loloish15
6.2Naxi4
Cite this entry
*sram ‘OTTER’.https://larc-iu.github.io/stedt/etymon/2595BibTeX
@misc{stedt-2595,
title = {{*sram 'OTTER'}},
author = {STEDT},
year = {2017},
note = {Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus (STEDT) v1.0, etymon #2595},
url = {https://larc-iu.github.io/stedt/etymon/2595}
}